Protecting the Planet, Not the People: The Dark Side of the 30×30 Goal

As the world prepares for the UN Biodiversity Conference (COP16) in Colombia, concerns are growing about the potential human rights abuses linked to the ambitious 30×30 goal ¹. This target aims to protect 30% of the world’s land and waters by 2030, but critics argue that it could lead to the displacement of millions of people, particularly Indigenous communities, from their ancestral territories.

The Problem with Fortress Conservation

The concept of “fortress conservation” has been widely criticized for its potential to lead to human rights abuses ¹. This approach involves creating protected areas that are off-limits to human activity, often without the consent of local communities. The result can be the displacement of people from their homes, loss of livelihoods, and cultural erasure.

A Rights-Based Approach to Conservation

In contrast, a rights-based approach to conservation recognizes the importance of involving local communities in decision-making processes ². This approach prioritizes the rights of Indigenous peoples and local communities to their lands, territories, and resources. It also recognizes the importance of traditional knowledge and practices in conservation efforts.

The Importance of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent

Free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) is a key principle in ensuring that the rights of Indigenous peoples and local communities are respected ². This means that communities must be fully informed about any proposed conservation efforts and must give their consent before any activities can take place.